Things To Know Pertaining To Death With Dignity Pros And Cons

| Thursday, June 25, 2015
By Ruthie Calderon

Physician assisted suicide has been at the center of controversy for quite a long. There are countries which have amended laws either to support or to reject the act. However, there are reasons that push individuals to consider this form of dying. In some instances it can be unquestionable and thus it has two sides. Outlined below are several tips basically for understanding death with dignity pros and cons.

There is need to appreciate that people suffer so much as a result of the incurable illnesses. They should be given a go ahead to either voluntary or involuntarily end their lives. This is to enable them end the much suffering that they are going through due to this incurable diseases. Allowing them will end their distress which can be a terrible to them.

However, in as much as dying is inevitable the issue of physician assisted suicide has been rejected by almost every state. Even if the person to be injected with the lethal chemical, it is not at their liberty to die. Many court systems do not allow this to be conducted even if the individual is competent. This counters its practice claiming that it is not worthy.

In favor of this, incurably ill people should be allowed to die. Even if it is not their right to die, it is more of subjecting them to continuous stressful situations if they continue suffering. Giving the doctors a go ahead to terminate their lives will mean a relief to the patients. This is because of desperation and the fact that they might never be fit again.

The most difficult part about this and that hinders the whole thing is the laws enacted by the states. Many of these are that the laws consider this form of a suicide as a crime. That is why a lot of activists are busy fighting for the rights of the ill. They claim that the lose put in place forces these persons to live yet they know that they are subjecting them to much pain.

To stop the pain they should be tolerated. Tolerating it does not halt the provision of care that will prolong the lives of the sick. The competent should be given a chance to die if they can no longer endure the much pain they are in. The only noble thing to engage is euthanasia where one is given a hand to stop their living through a toxic jab.

Nevertheless, according the doctors a chance to carry out such activity will drag the whole patients into a nightmare. In those countries which have allowed this might never appreciate the importance of palliative care. This will eventually result to too many of them practicing the act whether voluntary or involuntary.

In conclusion, all the factors discussed above are what one should bear in mind. It is so tricky that they have to understand both sides of the argument. Thinking critically should be highly regarded here so as to determine what is best for people.

About the Author:


Post a Comment